You are here

Home / Framework / Dose Response / Completed Dose Response Models / Francisella tularensis: Dose Response Experiments

General Overview

Francisella tularensis is the causative agent of tularemia or rabbit fever. It is an intracellular pathogenic species of Gram-negative bacteria, replicating mainly in macrophages, and has also been reported in amoebae.[1] Interest in this pathogen grew due to its high infectivity, ease of dissemination and consequently its potential use as biological weapon. [2][3][4] It can be easily disseminated via aerosols that once inhaled may result in tularemia pneumonia, a severe form of disease with high mortality if untreated.[5] Known as one of the most infectious pathogens, only a few F. tularensis organisms may cause infection.[6][7] The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have classified F. tularensis as a Category A bioterrorism agent for public health preparedness.

http://www.cdc.gov/tularemia/

Summary Data

Day and Berendt exposed 4-5 kg monkeys to aerosol particles of SCHU S-4 strain of F. tularensis.[8] The aerosol particles were administered into different sizes to study the effect of size distribution.

A set of classical dose-response data for F. tularensis infection via oral exposure by Quan et al were used in investigating the effects of inoculation route on the response.[9] Albino mice were infected orally with drinking water contaminated with 104 to 108 organisms of a highly virulent Aa strain.

Recommended Model

It is recommended that experiment 274 should be used as the best dose response model for inhalation. Inhalation is much more infective than the oral exposure in this case so that it should receive more attention in terms of emergency preparedness and public intervention.

Exponential and betapoisson model.jpg

References

  1. Titball, R. W., & Sjostedt A. (2003).  Francisella tularensis: an overview. American Society for Microbiology News. 69, 558-563.
  2. World Health Organization (1970).  Health Aspects of Chemical and Biological Weapons.
  3. Christopher, G. W., Cieslak T. J., Pavlin J. A., & Eitzen E. M. (1997).  Biological warfare: a historical perspective.. JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association). 278, 412-417.
  4. Kaufmann, A. F., Meltzer M. I., & Schmid G. P. (1997).  The economic impact of a bioterrorist attack: are prevention and post-attack intervention programs justifiable?. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2, 83-94.
  5. Stuart, BM. (1945).  Tularemic pneumonia: Review of American literature and report of 15 additional cases.. American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 210,
  6. Saslaw, S., Eigelsbach H. T., Wilson H. E., Prior J. A., & Carhart S. (1961).  Tularemia vaccine study I: intracutaneous challenge. Arch Intern Med. 107, 121-133.
  7. Saslaw, S., Eigelsbach H. T., Prior J. A., Wilson H. E., & Carhart S. (1961).  Tularemia vaccine study. II. Respiratory challenge. Arch Intern Med. 702-714.
  8. Day, W. C., & Berendt R. F. (1972).  Experimental Tularemia in Macaca mulatta: Relationship of Aerosol Particle Size to the Infectivity of Airborne Pasteurella tularensis. Infection and Immunity. 5, 1.
  9. Quan, S. F., McManus A. G., & von Fintel H. (1956).  Infectivity of Tularemia Applied to Intact Skin and Ingested in Drinking Water. Science. 123, 942-943.
ID # of Doses Agent Strain Dose Units Host type Μodel Optimized parameters Response type Reference
274 4 SCHU S-4 CFU monkey exponential
k = 4.73E-02
LD50/ID50 = 1.46E+01

death Quan, S F., A G. McManus, and H von Fintel. "Infectivity of Tularemia Applied to Intact Skin and Ingested in Drinking Water." Science. 123 (1956): 942-943.
275 5 Aa strain CFU mice exponential
k = 1.33E-07
LD50/ID50 = 5.22E+06

death John, D T., and K L. Hoppe. "Susceptibility of Wild Mammals to Infection with Naegleria fowleri." The Journal of Parasitology. 76 (1990): 6.
Recommended
Experiment ID:
274
# of Doses:
4
Agent Strain:
SCHU S-4
Dose Units:
CFU
Host type:
monkey
Μodel:
exponential
Optimized parameters:
k = 4.73E-02
LD50/ID50 = 1.46E+01

Reference:

Optimization Output for experiment 274

Monkeys / SCHU S-4 model data [1]
Dose Dead Survived Total
5 1 5 6
11 3 3 6
32 4 2 6
65 6 0 6

 

Goodness of fit and model selection
Model Deviance Δ Degrees 
of freedom		 χ20.95,1 
p-value		 χ20.95,m-k 
p-value
Exponential 1.26 -0.000367 3 3.84 
1		 7.81 
0.738
Beta Poisson 1.26 2 5.99 
0.531
Exponential is preferred to beta-Poisson; cannot reject good fit for exponential.

 

Optimized k parameter for the exponential model, from 10000 bootstrap iterations
Parameter MLE estimate Percentiles
0.5% 2.5% 5% 95% 97.5% 99.5%
k 4.73E-02 2.28E-02 2.72E-02 2.98E-02 7.81E-02 9.03E-02 1.11E-01
ID50/LD50/ETC* 1.46E+01 6.27E+00 7.67E+00 8.88E+00 2.33E+01 2.55E+01 3.04E+01
*Not a parameter of the exponential model; however, it facilitates comparison with other models.

 

Parameter histogram for exponential model (uncertainty of the parameter)

Exponential model plot, with confidence bounds around optimized model

References

  1. Day, W. C., & Berendt R. F. (1972).  Experimental Tularemia in Macaca mulatta: Relationship of Aerosol Particle Size to the Infectivity of Airborne Pasteurella tularensis. Infection and Immunity. 5, 1.
Experiment ID:
275
# of Doses:
5
Agent Strain:
Aa strain
Dose Units:
CFU
Host type:
mice
Μodel:
exponential
Optimized parameters:
k = 1.33E-07
LD50/ID50 = 5.22E+06

Reference:
Mice/ Aa strain model data [1]
Dose Dead Survived Total
1E+04 0 22 22
1E+05 1 21 22
1E+06 1 10 11
1E+07 16 6 22
1E+08 22 0 22

 

Goodness of fit and model selection
Model Deviance Δ Degrees 
of freedom		 χ20.95,1 
p-value		 χ20.95,m-k 
p-value
Exponential 1.27 0.0341 4 3.84 
0.854		 9.49 
0.867
Beta Poisson 1.23 3 7.81 
0.745
Exponential is preferred to beta-Poisson; cannot reject good fit for exponential.

 

Optimized k parameter for the exponential model, from 10000 bootstrap iterations
Parameter MLE estimate Percentiles
0.5% 2.5% 5% 95% 97.5% 99.5%
k 1.33E-07 6.86E-08 7.91E-08 8.83E-08 2.06E-07 2.24E-07 2.75E-07
ID50/LD50/ETC* 5.22E+06 2.52E+06 3.10E+06 3.37E+06 7.85E+06 8.76E+06 1.01E+07
*Not a parameter of the exponential model; however, it facilitates comparison with other models.

 

Parameter histogram for exponential model (uncertainty of the parameter)

Exponential model plot, with confidence bounds around optimized model

References

  1. Quan, S. F., McManus A. G., & von Fintel H. (1956).  Infectivity of Tularemia Applied to Intact Skin and Ingested in Drinking Water. Science. 123, 942-943.